data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0686/b0686e90d5d1c838a75ef2b513eed19cd8f408c2" alt="Elliot labs syncthing"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8abc8/8abc8bde04c5477bf7c87a14168b1a98e9f66bcb" alt="elliot labs syncthing elliot labs syncthing"
> Basically, it is determined by a version of a package that > for Live ISO, there is a little crazy logic that sets up the > "PRE-RELEASE/TESTING" text appearing in top-right hand
Elliot labs syncthing install#
> When I was trying to install f30 based remixed ISO, > On Sat, at 18:12 +0530, Danishka Navin wrote: > Could you please tell us what command did you used to
Elliot labs syncthing iso#
> version parameters otherwise we will be handling your ISO > You have probably used bad parameters when you were I think that all these problems are related. > /etc/system-release on Live ISO or from the. > Anaconda reads the product name and the product version from > If you have digital at the end, it only repeats the digit. > Added Hanthana Workstation (Vishwa)' in to the redhat-release > I am not sure if its a bug or I mage a mistake. > As in this image, Anaconda keeps duplicating the values of > I wonder if the issue caused by following entries in the > Then I copied fresh kisktars shipped by fedora and rerun with > workstation.ks -fslabel=h30 -cache=cache -tmpdir=tmp > livecd-creator -verbose -config=hanthana-live. > Btw, does livecd-creator read from /etc/os-release when we > I used the following command but did't use -product and. > On Mon, at 9:56 AM Danishka Navin > danishka(a)> wrote: > On Tue, at 6:16 PM Vendula Poncova > vponcova(a)> wrote: Adding Fedora devel list here, thereĬould be someone who is able to answer you this question. > Is it ok to modify /etc/os-release for re-branding purpose? On Wed, at 09:54 +0530, Danishka Navin wrote: If you maintain any of these packages and have any concerns, please letĪnkur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) | To rebuild them all in F29/F30 and push combined updates please? Could I please solicit the help of a proven-packager They all build correctly in F31 with the new version, so I do not expectĪny build failures. Last metadata expiration check: 0:53:07 ago on Fri 14:07:55 BST. Sudo dnf repoquery -source -whatrequires 'libdcm*(64bit)'
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4cdc4/4cdc4627bfdc292761de1e710a611748ad33f5f7" alt="elliot labs syncthing elliot labs syncthing"
( vs ), though, so dependent packages will also need to be rebuilt Still at 3.6.2 however, and need updating. Respective signed CHECKSUM files can be found here:įor direct download, the "latest" targets are always available here:įilename fetching URLs are available here:įor more information about the latest targets, please reference the Fedoraĭo note that it can take some of the mirrors up to 12 hours to "check-in" atĪ CVE in dcmtk was fixed in 3.6.4 which is in F31+. `atomic host upgrade`.Ĭorresponding image media for new installations can be downloaded from:Īlternatively, image artifacts can be found at the following links: That x86_64 architecture is the only one that undergoes automatedĮxisting systems can be upgraded in place via e.g. We are releasing images from multiple architectures but please note
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0686/b0686e90d5d1c838a75ef2b513eed19cd8f408c2" alt="Elliot labs syncthing"